<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big News!</title>
	<link>http://www.symagio.com/blog/2007/05/18/big-news/</link>
	<description>Symagio, LLC - Online Data Backup, Remote Data Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dc:date:1220469120 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220469120 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220469120 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Claim Construction: “The” condylar element does not mean “each and every” condylar element, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/382582795/claim-construct.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1220467200 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220467200 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220467200 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/382558885/patently-o-bits.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1220374740 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220374740 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220374740 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:CAFC Flips Call Routing Decision, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/381521070/cafc-flips-call.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1220323680 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220323680 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220323680 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Evidence Based Prosecution: Why are Deadlines Driving Response Timing?, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/380610144/evidence-based.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1220234700 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220234700 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220234700 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Law Review 2008: Ideas for Student Notes., LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/379776716/law-review-2008.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1220118360 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1220118360 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1220118360 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/379063332/patently-o-bi-6.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219770660 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219770660 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219770660 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:The Clarified Law of Inequitable Conduct, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/375384701/the-clarified-l.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219766760 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219766760 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219766760 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Important Inequitable Conduct Decision: Defendant Must Prove its Case, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/375334140/important-inequ.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219666980 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219666980 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219666980 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Greg Aharonian Discussed the WSJ’s “Idiotic Article on Patent Tr-lls”, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/374223790/greg-aharonian.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219666560 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219666560 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219666560 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patent Law Bits and Bytes No 61, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/374220864/patent-law-bits.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219610640 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219610640 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219610640 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Albritton v. Patent Troll Tracker: Patently-O’s Subpoena, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/373687744/albritton-v-p-1.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219438200 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219438200 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219438200 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Public &amp; Experimental Use: Reduction to Practice Requires Knowledge that Invention Works for Intended Purpose, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/372177776/public-experime.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219435560 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219435560 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219435560 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:The Surprising Efficacy of Inter Partes Reexaminations, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/372146386/the-surprising.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219349340 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219349340 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219349340 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Cooper Techs: PTO’s Interpretation of “Original Application” Given Chevron Deference, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/371229710/cooper-techs-pt.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219345560 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219345560 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219345560 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 60: Nintendo Wii, etc., LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/371184771/patently-o-bi-5.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219331280 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219331280 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219331280 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Damages Tally Begin as Soon as Defendant is Given Notice of Infringement, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/371006817/damages-tallies.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219176960 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219176960 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219176960 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Marking of Prescription Drug Does Not Create DJ Jurisdiction for Generic Competitor, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/368893233/marking-of-pres.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219170480 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219170480 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219170480 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 59, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/369251544/patently-o-bi-4.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219083180 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219083180 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219083180 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:CAFC Finally Affirms a Finding of Infringement by Equivalents, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/368302178/cafc-finally-af.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1219028700 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1219028700 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1219028700 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Reissue Claim is Improperly Broadened if “Broader in Any Respect.”, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/367731293/reissue-claim-i.html, -->
