<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techcrunch Party in NYC</title>
	<link>http://www.symagio.com/blog/2006/11/18/techcrunch-party-in-nyc/</link>
	<description>Symagio, LLC - Online Data Backup, Remote Data Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dc:date:1229533620 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229533620 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229533620 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:BPAI: PTO Should Apply Broadest Reasonable Claim Interpretation to Section 101 Analysis, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/487796074/bpai-pto-should.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229464140 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229464140 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229464140 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:CAFC Affirms PTO’s right to fire quality assurance specialist for 35%+ error rate., LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/486984651/cafc-affirms-pt.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229450160 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229450160 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229450160 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Patentee in Declaratory Judgment Action, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/486812754/court-lacks-per.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229435940 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229435940 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229435940 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Means-Plus-Function Fools Gold, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/486623498/means-plus-func.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229307720 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229307720 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229307720 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Federal Circuit Affirms Nonobviousness of Plavix Isomer Patent, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/485091136/federal-circu-1.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229112000 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229112000 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229112000 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Enforcing Foreign Patents in the US: Distinguishing Voda, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/482986033/enforcing-forei.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1229011500 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1229011500 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1229011500 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Sullivan’s IP Law Outline, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/481785109/sullivans-ip-la.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228930860 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228930860 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228930860 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Court: Parties Must Justify Need for Claim Construction, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/480790787/court-parties-m.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228927080 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228927080 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228927080 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Federal Circuit Affirms Narrow Construction of “Internet Billing Method”, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/480736474/federal-circuit.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228892220 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228892220 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228892220 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/480295998/patently-o-bi-2.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228865640 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228865640 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228865640 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:New Patent Appeals Rules: Delayed by Whitehouse OMB, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/480013444/new-patent-appe.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228767240 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228767240 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228767240 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Post-Reexamination Litigation Estoppel, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/479515705/post-reexaminat.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228745700 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228745700 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228745700 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:During prosecution, claims are indefinite when amenable to multiple plausible constructions, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/478484542/during-prosecut.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228507800 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228507800 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228507800 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Oral Arguments in Tafas v. Dudas, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/476005887/oral-arguments.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228394820 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228394820 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228394820 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/474623817/patently-o-bi-1.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228322520 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228322520 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228322520 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:California’s One-Sided Patent Regime: Litigating With Immunity, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/473755848/californias-one.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228239660 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228239660 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228239660 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patent Practitioner Ethics Update, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/472690390/patent-practiti.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228170360 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228170360 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228170360 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Patently-O Bits and Bytes: Vote for Patently-O, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/471781800/patently-o-bits.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228153740 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228153740 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228153740 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Standard Setting and Waiver of Patent Rights, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/471529473/standard-settin.html, -->
<!-- dc:date:1228148760 --><!-- DEBUG TICKS:1228148760 VIRGIN:0 ADJUST:0 --><!-- TICKS:1228148760 SITEURL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog TITLE:Constitutional Separation of Powers, LINK:http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObviousPatentLawBlog/~3/471455546/constitutional.html, -->
